100 more MP’s? What a total charade at equality!

The state Newspaper, the Herald in its headlines yesterday the 27th of April 2012, proudly announced the possibility of the creation of 100 more Parliamentary seats in Zimbabwe, all reserved for women. The Co-Chairperson of the Constitutional Parliamentary Select Committee (COPAC) and Member of Parliament for the MDC-T Douglas Mwonzora proudly announced that this creation is a legislative response to the new constitutional provision for gender ‘equality’ and is in compliance with the SADC Gender and Development Protocol.

Parliament of Zimbabwe Building

I found this announcement not only condescending of women but also reflective of the highly paternalistic character of the current parliament that we have in Zimbabwe. Women in Zimbabwe have been asking for equal representation in politics and other key decision-making positions for a long time and this is their answer? Seriously?

For one the factors that impeded women’s participation in politics can not be addressed by creating new posts.

The prevalence of political violence and the impunity granted to perpetrators of state-sponsored violence against women exacerbates the prevalence of violence which deters most women from wanting to participate in politics. Worse still for women to field their names as candidates for election exposes them to greater risks of violent attacks hence until it is addressed they will fear participating.

The economic barriers that exist for women to participate in public office generally and as candidates in the electoral process in particular are still there. The levels of poverty in Zimbabwe have been on the increase worse with a large part of the population living below the poverty datum line. The continued economic marginalisation of women with access to and control of land and other resources crucial to their economic development is still there.  There is no commitment to increase financing for women’s electoral campaigns.

There is hardly enough civic education and heightened campaigns encouraging women to participate in the electoral process or to address the cultural perceptions that limit women’s participation in politics. I mean the majority of people in Zimbabwe still believe gender equality is a foreign concept that seeks to drive the acculturation of our society and make women superior to men so what chances do we have of convincing that same society that women can be as good leaders as men or even better?

And here is our government thinking the answer to all these problems is to create a 100 more seats. This announcement coming right after Zimbabwe’s review by the Committee on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women shows just how much they do not understand the concept of substantive equality.

I can even visualise right now the members of parliament proudly thinking they have done us a favour in thinking; “Öh you poor women of Zimbabwe. You have been marginalised in politics for so long but come now-cry no more (wiping tears like a benevolent father to his 2 year old’s cheek). We have heard your cries and we will set up special seats for you. Just for you.”

This whole incident stinks of self-aggrandisement, with current male members of parliament merely protecting their seats and creating new ones for women. That is not substantive equality. Substantive equality would be achieved by creating an enabling environment for would be female candidates to contest the existing seats on an equal footing with the male candidates. Besides; we do not need more parliamentarians when the existing ones are hardly delivering and the state resources are overstretched in meeting their demands for allowances and such other nonsense.

2 thoughts on “100 more MP’s? What a total charade at equality!

  1. Don’t you think despite the intentions behind the move, this is an opportunity that can potentially change zim politics, similar to how the Rwandan government has benefited from having a substantial number of women in parliament. I understand that the violent political climate is unfavourable for women but I’m optimistic – watching the space

    1. Thanks Gugu. I am very skeptical that creating new posts will really change the face of women’s participation in politics.I feel as if the men are not taking the gender parity idea seriously because taking it seriously would mean enabling women to contest the existing seats on an equal footing, eliminating the factors that prevent women from participating fully and ensuring that in the future women wont need special measures to participate fully. Yes the 100 posts may seem like a special measure but special temporary measures are there to put into effect structural, social and cultural changes necessary to correct past and current forms and effects of discrimination against women.Yes the 100 post will increase the numbers but do they really cultivate real equality? The CEDAW Committee stresses that these measures should not be just about numerical statistics but about societal transformations in attitudes,perceptions-they should also be about legal, economic and social frameworks that enable women to stand on their own after reaching the goal and competing on an equal footing. Is the spirit behind the 100 posts about these issues?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s